Analysis of Students' Mathematical Literacy Skills Reviewed from Problem Solving Skills
Abstract
This study aims to describe students' mathematical literacy skills reviewed from problem-solving skills in solving AKM-shaped questions. The method of this research is a qualitative descriptive study. This study was conducted in class 10 MAN 3 Jakarta Pusat and took 251 students as respondents. Data collection in this study was carried out by conducting problem-solving tests, mathematical literacy tests, and interviews. Based on the level of mathematics literacy achievement, students are grouped into 4 levels, namely, requiring special intervention, basic, professional, and advanced. While problem-solving skills are grouped into 3 categories, namely low, medium, and high. The results showed that most students, regardless of problem-solving skills category, were at “needing special intervention” level in mathematical literacy achievement. However, no students in the low problem-solving skills category reached the advanced level in mathematical literacy. Students often ignore the “looking back” step in problem solving. In fact, ignoring this step causes many students to make mistakes in the final results, including students with higher problem-solving skills. These results indicate the importance of teacher intervention in mathematics learning so that students are more careful and effective in solving problems.
Downloads
References
Buyung, & Sumarli. (2021). Analisis kesulitan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita berbasis kemampuan pemecahan masalah. Variabel, 4(2), 61–66.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). California: SAGE Publications.
Herlita, Sugiatno, & Dian. (2018). Potensi looking back siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal materi barisan dan deret aritmetika di SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 7(9).
Kemendikbud. (2016). Silabus mata pelajaran sekolah menengah atas/madrasah aliyah/sekolah menengah kejuruan/madrasah aliyah kejuruan (SMA/MA/SMK/MAK) mata pelajaran matematika. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Rapor pendidikan publik. Retrieved from Pusat Asesmen Pendidikan website: https://pusmendik.kemdikbud.go.id/profil_pendidikan/profil-wilayah.php
Lester Jr, F. K. (2003). From problem solving to modeling: The evolution of thinking about research on complex mathematical activity. Beyond Constructivism: Models and Modeling Perspectives on Mathematical Problem Solving, Learning, and Teaching.
Maghfiroh, F. L., Amin, S. M., Ibrahim, M., & Hartatik, S. (2021). Keefektifan pendekatan pendidikan matematika realistik Indonesia terhadap kemampuan literasi numerasi siswa di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(5), 3342–3351.
Muslimah, H., & Pujiastuti, H. (2020). Analisis kemampuan literasi matematis siswa dalam memecahkan masalah matematika berbentuk soal cerita. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Sains, 8(1), 36–43.
NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics (Vol. 1). National Council of Teachers of.
Normalasari, R., Rachmawati, T. K., & Wiyanto, Y. T. (2022). Kemampuan looking back dalam pemecahan masalah matematika pada siswa. Gunung Djati Conference Series, 17.
OECD. (2009). Learning mathematics for life: A view perspective from PISA.
OECD. (2019). Indonesia - Country Note - PISA 2018 Results.
OECD. (2021). PISA 2022 mathematics framework. Retrieved from https://pisa2022-maths.oecd.org/
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Ojose, B. (2011). Mathematics literacy: Are we able to put the mathematics we learn into everyday use? Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 89–100.
Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran. (2020). AKM dan implikasinya pada pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Pusmendik. (2022). Buku panduan capaian hasil asesmen nasional. Jakarta: Kemendikbudristek RI.
Sari, R. H. N. (2015). Literasi matematika: Apa, mengapa dan bagaimana? Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika UNY 2015, 713–720.
Setiani, N., Roza, Y., & Maimunah. (2022). Analisis kemampuan siswa dalam pemahaman konsep matematis materi peluang pada siswa SMP. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 06(02), 2286–2297.
Setyawan, D., & Siswono, T. Y. E. (2020). Proses memeriksa kembali dalam memecahkan masalah kontekstual matematis ditinjau dari gaya belajar. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 455–460.
Sirait, M. A., Hartoyo, A., & Suratman, D. (2016). Kemampuan literasi matematis siswa ditinjau dari kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa SMP di Pontianak. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 5(6), 1–10.
Somakim. (2010). Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis dan self-efficacy matematik siswa sekolah menengah pertama dengan penggunaan pendekatan matematika realistik. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Stacey, K. (2012). The international assessment of mathematical literacy. 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education. Seoul, Korea: COEX.
Suminar, R. K., & Rahman, I. N. (2022). Mathematical problem solving ability to develop numerical literacy in elementary school students. Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 120–131.
Tai, W.-C., & Lin, S.-W. (2015). Relationship between problem-solving style and mathematical literacy. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(11), 1480–1486.
Timutius, F., Apriliani, N. R., & Bernard, M. (2018). Analisis kesalahan siswa kelas IX-G di SMP Negeri 3 Cimahi dalam menyelesaikan soal pemecahan masalah matematik pada materi lingkaran. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 1(3), 305–312.
Wahyu, A., Wibowo, T., & Kurniawan, H. (2019). Analisis kemampuan looking back siswa dalam pemecahan masalah matematika. Prosiding Sendika, 5(1), 81–87.
Zainiyah, U., & Marsigit. (2018). Literasi matematika: Bagaimana jika ditinjau dari kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa SD kelas tinggi? Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 5–14.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The copyright for all articles belongs to the authors. All other copyright is held by the journal.
