Analysis of Underachiever Students' Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability on The Topic Circle Viewed from Adversity Quotient
Abstract
This study aims to: (1) Know the mathematical problem-solving abilities of underachiever students, (2) Adversity Quotient profiles of underachiever students, and (3) The relationship between Adversity Quotient and mathematical problem-solving abilities of underachiever students. This research is a qualitative research type underachiever case study. The research subjects were 6 underachiever students in 2nd grade at SMA Negeri 6 Bogor and SMA Negeri 1 Babakan Madang. The instruments used in this research were the ARP (Adversity Response Profile) questionnaire and a mathematical problem-solving ability test. Data analysis in this study aims to determine the Adversity Quotient profile using Stolz's theory and mathematical problem-solving abilities based on Polya's steps. The results showed that underachiever students had Camper and Quitter type of Adversity Quotient profiles. Underachiever students with a Camper profile have pretty good mathematical problem-solving abilities. Meanwhile, students who had Quitter profiles have very less good mathematical problem-solving skills.
Keywords: problem-solving, underachiever, adversity quotient.
Downloads
References
Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Hakim, F. (2020). Faktor Adversity Quotient dalam Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Pembuktian Matematis Topik Teori Grup. Indonesian Journal of Educational Science (IJES), 2(2), 90–98.
Hulaikah, M., Degeng, I., & Murwani, F. D. (2020). The Effect of Experiential Learning and Adversity Quotient on Problem-solving Ability. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 869–884.
Jemina, J. D., & Sulatra, J. R. S. (2022). Adversity Quotient and Metacognion as Related to Mathematics Performance. International Journal on Integrated Education, 5(6), 173–175.
Junedi, B., Mahuda, I., & Kusuma, J. W. (2020). Optimalisasi keterampilan pembelajaran abad 21 dalam proses pembelajaran pada Guru MTs Massaratul Mut’allimin Banten. Transformasi: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 16(1), 63–72.
Merianah, M. (2019). Pengaruh kecerdasan emosional dan Adversity Quotient terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa SDIT IQRA’1 kota Bengkulu. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Raflesia, 4(1), 29–35.
Moleong, L. J. (2021). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Muhayana, I., Sridana, N., Prayitno, S., & Amrullah, A. (2021). Pengaruh Adversity Quotient Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika SMPN 1 Narmada Tahun Ajaran 2019/2020. Griya Journal of Mathematics Education and Application, 1(2), 132–141.
NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.
Nurlaelah, A., & Ilyas, M. (2021). Pengaruh Adversity Quotient terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa SD. Proximal: Jurnal Penelitian Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 89–97.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 result combined executive summaries. PISAOECD Publishing.
Padliani, P., Bennu, S., & Rizal, M. (2019). Profil Pemecahan Masalah Persamaan Linear Satu Variabel Siswa Climber Pada Kelas VII SMP Negeri 3 Palu. Mitra Sains, 7(3), 311–320.
Pradiarti, R. A., & Subanji, S. (2022). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMP ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(3), 379–390.
Prayogi, R. D. (2020). Kecakapan abad 21: Kompetensi digital pendidik masa depan. Manajemen Pendidikan, 14(2).
Sewell, C. J. P., & Goings, R. B. (2020). “I Struggled But I Made It”: Black Gifted Underachievers on Transitioning to College. Journal of Advanced Academics, 31(2), 111–128.
Stoltz, P. G. (2000). Adversity Quotient Work:Turning Obstacles into Opportunities. William Morrow New York.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The copyright for all articles belongs to the authors. All other copyright is held by the journal.
